That outputs are grounded in the record, and that a person verified them
Every answer carries the document and the page it came from, and the page opens. Drafts are drafts until a person approves them.
ABA Formal Opinion 512 does not ask whether your AI vendor is good. It asks whether your firm can show what the vendor retains, whether it trains on your data, what its security protocols and liability limits are, whether it screens for conflicts among your clients, and where you go for relief if it breaches. Most security pages answer a different question. This one answers that one.
Every answer carries the document and the page it came from, and the page opens. Drafts are drafts until a person approves them.
The eight-week implementation includes an extraction trial on your own live binders, and the coverage self-score on every extraction tells you what it could not find.
Your data lives in your own tenant database. If your firm configured it, generated it, uploaded it or produced it, it is yours, by contract.
The AI provider accounts are in your firm's name under standard paid API terms, which exclude prompts and responses from model training. That protection is between your firm and the provider, not something we negotiate on your behalf.
SOC 2 Type II report available under a non-disclosure agreement. Liability terms are in the agreement, not in a marketing claim.
Every tool call, admin action, approval and export is logged with the user and the timestamp. Deterministic steps and model calls are visually distinguished everywhere they appear.
Connectors are typed and per-tenant with field-level access controls. Every write to your case system is staged, whitelisted and approved by a person. Nothing sends to a third party without an approval.
Administrator deep-dive, working sessions on your own book, a recorded training library inside your tenant, and 90 and 180 day refreshers, all part of implementation.
Zero markup on model consumption. Your firm holds the provider accounts and receives the raw provider invoices.
Sources for the demands above: ABA Formal Opinion 512 (29 July 2024), the State Bar of California 2026 Practical Guidance, Texas Ethics Opinion 705, Florida Ethics Opinion 24-1, and 22 NYCRR Part 161, effective 1 June 2026. We are not your ethics counsel and this is not legal advice. It is a map of the questions we are asked most often, and our answers to them.
Provisioned when your tenant is created. Physical isolation, not row filtering, and no shared customers table anywhere. A dump of another customer's database contains nothing of yours.
SAML and OpenID Connect against your own identity provider, so multi-factor authentication and your own conditional access policies apply to Mayeshal exactly as they apply to everything else.
Grants are resource, action and scope. Filtering happens in the query, so a record a user is not entitled to see is never retrieved rather than merely hidden.
The check runs before the tool executes, not after it returns.
Support access is granted by you, time-bound, and logged. The platform console we operate and the tenant console you operate are separate systems.
TLS on every external connection with strict transport security. At rest, AES-256 on the managed database cluster and its backups, with credentials and provider keys separately encrypted at the column level.
Droplets and the managed database cluster run in the United States.
Most vendors have to explain their own data retention policy to you, because your prompts pass through their account. Ours do not. Your firm's AI provider accounts are created in your firm's name and billed to your firm's payment method. Standard paid API terms already exclude prompts and responses from model training, so when your counsel asks whether your client's medical records are training a model, the answer is a term in a contract your firm signed directly with the provider, and you can read it.
You also get the raw provider invoices, and an in-platform cost meter that records every call. Two independent records of the same thing, one of which we do not produce.
Each agent has its model pinned by identifier. A provider shipping a new version does not silently change how your firm's letters read.
Ask that of everyone on your shortlist, including us. Our answer, in five parts, and it is a contractual commitment rather than a feature we are describing:
The definition of what is yours is deliberately blunt: if your firm configured it, generated it, uploaded it or produced it, it is yours. The orchestration engine, the connector framework, the permission model and the source code are ours. There is no third category.
At the Micronetbd company level. The report is available under a non-disclosure agreement, covering Security, Availability and Confidentiality. Mayeshal is built and operated under those controls. Mayeshal is not yet separately in audit scope as its own system, and we will not imply that it is.
HIPAA-ready posture, with protected health information tagged and access-controlled by default and business associate agreements available on Enterprise. GDPR and CCPA, with the customer as controller and Micronetbd as processor. ISO 27001 aligned in practice; not certified. Certification is on the roadmap and we will say so until the certificate exists.
Salesforce Silver (Ridge) Consulting Partner. Filevine partner. Litify partner. DocuSign consulting partner.
Our recovery time objective is four hours for a full database restore and our recovery point objective is one hour of maximum data loss, in practice much less through transaction log recovery. Application services are stateless and redeployable from images in minutes.
Thirty minutes, on a screen share, on a matter you pick. We connect nothing, install nothing and ask for no credentials to have that conversation. If it is not obviously useful in the first ten minutes, we will tell you so and you get your afternoon back.